On Oct 30, 12:21 ¨Âí¬ ÂåòôòáÓãèáòð¼ìé®®®Àâåòôòáí­óãèáòðæ®äå¾ ÷òïôåº
> Hi Aldric,
>
> Am Samstag, 31. Okt 2009, 01:46:10 +0900 schrieb Aldric Giacomoni:
>
> > Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> > > String#notempty?
>
> > Because some behavior is not there by default doesn't mean it's
> > a bias.
>
> That's what I wanted to say: I am convinced it should be there by
> default. It's just a few lines of code. It's pure logic when you
> have Numeric#nonzero? and it's very useful to build default
> values:
>
> str.notempty? || "(none)"  analoigous to SQL-coalesce()
>

So basically "String#notempty?" would be the same thing as
"String#any?" ?