Kon'nichiha Suketa-san,

> From: Masaki Suketa
> Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2000 8:10 PM

> > 2. Self-testing execution...
> > 
> > > and then having something that extracted and ran these
> > > 
> > >   ruby ru myfile.rb

> Maybe I think "ru" syntax is associated with RubyUnit. So, 
> I think this syntax not so good for
> 
>   =begin test testsupp
>   =end
> 
> So, I think better
> 
>   ruby test myfile.rb

Absolutely.
'test.rb' which knows testing methods like RubyUnit or testsupp
should be packed as Ruby standard library.


By the way, to get document using RDtool we do;

% rd2 foo.rd

Then '=begin ... =end' lines in foo.rd are parsed.
According to this manner,  how do you think testing like;

% rt myfile.rb

If you like it, name 'rt.rb' might be better than 'test.rb' ...

// NaHi