Eric Hodel wrote:
> On Aug 26, 2009, at 08:12, Mark Moseley wrote:
> 
>> anyone had any ideas.
> Why isn't ruby-debug-base "fat" (containing both 1.8 and 1.9 code)?
> 
> See also:
> 
> http://tenderlovemaking.com/2009/05/07/fat-binary-gems-make-the-rockin-world-go-round/

I'd like it to be, but that's up to Kent Sibilev and Rocky Bernstein, 
the admins of that gem. I asked Rocky a few weeks ago about including my 
changes into linecache, but he's not comfortable with the approach that 
I took. I admit that it's hackish and needs to be revisited.

Mark
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.