On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Mike Stephens<rubfor / recitel.net> wrote:
> Fabian Streitel wrote:
>
> Would you care to expand on why the number of pages/tables swings the
> balance? You see I always go back to the fact that 20+ years ago 'we'
> built big complex systems (eg hundreds of tables/pages) and we didn't
> need Rails.


How clean was the code in those systems? Was it easy to find something
that you were looking for if you were unfamiliar with the codebase?