On Jul 31, 9:03 ¨Âí¬ ÂòõîÓïõó¼âòçóï®®®Àçíáéì®ãïí¾ ÷òïôåº
> Luis Lavena wrote:
> > Playing more dumb on your question, you're pointing to a Ruby
> > installer version 1.8.5, which differs A LOT from 1.8.6 ir 1.9.1,
> > which I'm not going to explain over here.
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Look for "Ruby Em Windows" athttp://www.ruby-lang.org/pt/downloads/
>
> Ruby 1.8.6 One-Click Installer (md5: 3b768d48ed4e25991762e8c76e54f28d)
> VersåÐ Está×el (recomendada)
> Ruby 1.8.6 Binary (md5: d4ca9d387614108156289fb6c4208dd0) VersåÐ Está×el
> (recomendada)
>
> Booth are links that I posted here. Where is version 1.8.5 that you
> mentioned?


"> Actually, my question is about what differs
thishttp://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/18566/ruby186-25.exe"

Sorry, 186-25 confused me. Anyhow..


> > And my request and the reasoning behind it:
>
> >http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/24571
>
> Those libs that are not in binaries zip file are very important. Why
> ruby developers didn't include them in binaries zip file?

Dunno, ask them, tried since 2006 without any success.

--
Luis Lavena