Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela / cinnober.com> writes:

> If I could whine a little, I'd change chomp? to chompable. $_.chomp? gives
> me feeling of ($_ == $/).

Feel free! However, it's an internal C method, so it would probably be 
called something like rb_str_chomp_p or somesuch.

> Great idea. Before you post any results, could you tell a little bit
> about the underlying architecture? Are you using benchmark.rb,
> something homegrown or adaptation of some existing framework (like
> RubyUnit)?

I'll post the whole lot when I'm done.


Dave