On Jun 9, 2009, at 6:51 PM, s.ross wrote:

> Threads have gotten a terrible reputation in 1.8 so on most cases  
> they have been easy to ignore in favor of processes. If this  
> (ignoring threads) is still the likely case in 1.9 then that would  
> be good to know.

What I've been trying to say is that they are two different tools for  
two different jobs.

James Edward Gray II