On 9 Jun 2009, at 17:06, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:16 AM, James  
> Gray<james / grayproductions.net> wrote:
>> What I think you're getting at here is, yes, threading still isn't  
>> the way
>> to get real concurrency on Ruby 1.9.  If you really want to do two  
>> things at
>> once, you're going to need processes in Ruby.
>
> Or just use JRuby, and real concurrent/parallel threads will just work
> out of the box :)

And on Windows too. Damn smug JVM users ;p


Ellie

Eleanor McHugh
Games With Brains
http://slides.games-with-brains.net
----
raise ArgumentError unless @reality.responds_to? :reason