"Reid Thompson" <reid.thompson / ateb.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:1243609487.3435.5.camel / raker.ateb.com...
> What I mean is..
> if endless ruby code is allowed, it cannot be strictly optional.  If a
> core class or any other class/project that you utilize is coded without
> ends, then you get endless ruby whether you want it or not.

For this reason, wouldn't it be possible to add an "option"-parameter to 
"require"?