On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM, J Haas <Myrdred / gmail.com> wrote: > On May 20, 8:51 ¨Âí¬ Òéãë ÄåÎáôáìå ¼òéãë®äåîáô®®®Àçíáéì®ãïí÷òïôåº >> Seriously, if you measure things by avoiding extra keystrokes, get a >> better editor. ¨Â öáìõòåáäáâéìéôïöåò ðáòóéíïîïæ ìåøéãáéôåíó® > > Cluttering up your code with "end" everywhere makes it less readable, > not more. Honestly, that's subjective. Some people prefer delimiters some don't. In general I'm not a fan of languages whose syntax depends on the number of rather than just the presence of whitespace characters. I find it hard to count blanks while reading. I tried hard to like haml for instance. It has a lot of good points, but the pythonic style of nesting just doesn't work for me. In code, the real solution is not to nest so deeply that it becomes a problem, learn to use the composed method pattern. -- Rick DeNatale Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale