On Mar 27, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Andrew S. Townley wrote:

> Is there a reason you think this might be more suitable?

it ensures valid xml and supports some xml-ish stuff.  otherwise i  
just found it too constraining to use.

a @ http://codeforpeople.com/
--
we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being  
better. simply reflect on that.
h.h. the 14th dalai lama