On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 05:16 +0900, ara.t.howard wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Andrew S. Townley wrote:
> 
> > I want a really slick tool/syntax for generating complex XML documents
> > using multiple namespaces and processing instructions.  I've been  
> > doing
> > this in various ways for several years, and nearly all of them suck --
> > equally and in different ways.
> 
> this may interest you - i wrote it before tagz
> 
> http://codeforpeople.com/lib/ruby/xx/xx-2.0.0/README
> 
> quite a while back

I can see the family resemblance! :)

Still, I think I'd prefer to go with Tagz + the Namespace and processing
instruction support I proposed (or something similar).

Is there a reason you think this might be more suitable?
-- 
Andrew S. Townley <ast / atownley.org>
http://atownley.org