2009/2/23 Michael Malone <michael.malone / tait.co.nz>:
> Phlip wrote:
>>
>> john maclean wrote:
>>
>>> Why isn't there a ruby node within info? Will there ever be one or is
>>> it not a worthwhile project?
>>
>> What do you mean? a ruby.info site? grab it and run with it if you like!
>>
> I think he means 'info ruby' much like 'man ruby' although, when I type
> 'info ruby' I get a response!  It exists for me.
>
> =======================================================================
> This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
> addressee.  It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
> the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
> lost by reason of this transmission.
> If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
> apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
> other act on the email.
> Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
> altered or corrupted during transmission.
> =======================================================================
>
>
>

OK `info ruby` is pretty much the same as `man ruby`. Compare that to
`info awk` or `info tar`.  Those docs are many nodes deep.

-- 
John Maclean
07739 171 531
MSc (DIC)

Timezone: GMT