Subject: Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond
From: James Coglan <jcoglan googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:44:27 +0900
References: 327704327756327769327774327892327897327901327905327910
In-reply-to: 327910
--000e0cd2982442f28f0462bc4aab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
>
> What do you mean with "Hash ordering"?
> An order for Hash instances? Hash doesn't define a <