This is great - nice work by the ruby team!

In updating one of my gems for 1.9 compatability, I came across this 
behaviour (which I don't believe I've seen noted in the other changes 
lists), and just wanted to find out if it is expected:

$ irb
>> a = *[1]; p a
=> 1
>>
$ irb1.9
>> a = *[1]; p a
=> [1]
>>

Regards,

Charles
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.