Robert Dober wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
> <charles.nutter / sun.com> wrote:
>> Perhaps even as a replacement for catch/throw? (Hey, now I'm on topic!)
> My question is, and apologies if I am being stupid here, what is the
> added value of such a cc? I mean what can it do that catch/throw
> cannot. I have to admit that cc just makes my mind explode, so I might
> miss the obvious.

We pass more specs? :)

Seriously though...probably not a great deal, other than that 
catch/throw feels a little weird to me itself. I figured if we could at 
least support callcc in one way it would be better than not supporting 
it at all. Do you think it's a bad idea to do this, rather than having 
callcc fail for all uses?

- Charlie