On Jan 29, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Gregory Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Martin DeMello
> <martindemello / gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Eric Hodel <drbrain / segment7.net>  
>> wrote:
>>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 3:24, Martin DeMello <martindemello / gmail.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The RDoc documentation is a pretty bad sample, since the majority  
>>>> of
>>>> the methods say 'not documented'. I suggest putting a small but
>>>> well-documented project on the site purely to act as a demo.
>>>
>>> Patches welcome
>>
>> Will sift rubyforge for candidates. Prawn looks pretty good in terms
>> of coverage, though perhaps something smaller would be better.
>
> Now that prawn has been split out into various extensions, prawn-core
> isn't too bad.
> http://prawn.majesticseacreature.com/docs/prawn-core/
>
> I'll probably give the latest RDoc a try soon, and post here if I do.

Oh, you can rebuild all your rdoc on your machine with:

sudo gem rdoc --all --no-ri