On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Pascal J. Bourguignon
<pjb / informatimago.com> wrote:
> "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb / cesmail.net> writes:
>> In short, I suspect that a more practical solution might be a language
>> that has object orientation and functional coding styles both baked in
>> right from the start. I'm not an expert on all the dozens of "obscure"
>> languages out there, so I can't give any names. But I know they exist.
>
> Common Lisp.
>
> --
> __Pascal Bourguignon__
>
>
And Scala (if you like static typing - gasp! ;), OCaml and F# (I believe).


-- 
Dean Wampler
http://www.objectmentor.com
http://www.polyglotprogramming.com
http://www.aspectprogramming.com
http://aquarium.rubyforge.org
http://www.contract4j.org