"M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb / cesmail.net> writes:
> In short, I suspect that a more practical solution might be a language
> that has object orientation and functional coding styles both baked in
> right from the start. I'm not an expert on all the dozens of "obscure"
> languages out there, so I can't give any names. But I know they exist.

Common Lisp.

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__