Sebastian Hungerecker wrote:
> Actually a.concat(b) is the simpler way to write this. a += b does 
> something
> slightly different (create a third array [1,2,3,4] and then assign that 
> to a)

Yes of course, sorry about that.

However I still don't see what the OP found funny...
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.