davetron5000 wrote: > Yeah, that is what I'm looking for. I guess part 2 of my question is > that given that RDoc is so prolific, what are the chances that rdoc > will embrace some of these additional features so that most ruby > libraries can take advantage of this? Although RDoc remains the de-facto API documentation tool for Ruby, it is no longer a part of the core Ruby distribution. It's just another project; there's nothing blessed or official about it. So I ask you: why not simply embrace YARDoc (which already supports all RDoc syntax) and leave RDoc behind? YARDoc does everything that we want, so let's use and improve the tool that best suits our purpose. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.