On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Brian Adkins <lojicdotcom / gmail.com> wrote:
> Robert Dober <robert.dober / gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Brian Adkins <lojicdotcom / gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Robert Dober <robert.dober / gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> There is an old joke: How do you call a dear without eyes? No idea!
>> And how do you call a dear without eyes and legs? Still no idea.
>> Unfortunately the later applies to what you say :(
>> Can you give an example please.
>
> I have no idear what you're talking about above, but the following
> might help:
You got it :)
>
> http://gigamonkeys.com/book/object-reorientation-generic-functions.html
Well Ruby does not have method composition but everything, especially
the generic part, is super-seeded by the dynamic typing model.
Robert

-- 
Ne baisse jamais la tóÕe, tu ne verrais plus les ñÕoiles.

Robert Dober ;)