Garance A Drosihn wrote:

> While I agree with many of the points here, let me also say that
> I'd still prefer a "core ruby" which was just the plain-old
> command-line scripting support.  Then have a separate package
> which adds the objects for GUI support (whatever that would be).

Hm, yeah.  I thought about touching on this topic earlier.  I was thinking, 
specifically, of the Java model of varying levels of "support" in JVMs, 
targetted for different platforms.  Personal Java, etc.

-- 
--- SER