On Nov 19, 11:50 ¨Âí¬ ¢ÁöäÇòéíí¢ ¼á®®®Àáöäé®ïòç÷òïôåº
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Daniel Berger <djber... / gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hm, random idea here...if specs were formalized somehow...then we could
> > autogenerate a test spec from the written spec and vice-versa. A bridge
> > between PM's and programmers. Something like UML, but for tests...
>
> > I dunno...just a thought. Maybe it already exists?
>
> It's called FIT[1], or, in the Ruby world, Cucumber[2] (successor to
> the RSpec Story Runner).
>
> [1]http://fit.c2.com/
> [2]http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber/wikis

Aha, thanks! I saw Brandon Keeper's talk[1] on Cucumber at the Great
Lakes Ruby Bash, so I should have remembered that.

Regards,

Dan

[1] http://www.slideshare.net/bkeepers/behavior-driven-development-with-cucumber-presentation