On Nov 18, 2008, at 4:12 PM, Daniel Berger wrote:

> I think Shoulda can create a printable, formatable spec from the tests
> themselves that PM's can easily read. Or is that RSpec? Or do either
> of them have that feature? I thought one of them did.
>

you mean as opposed to reading the *actual* spec right?  (aka the  
code)  ;-)

sorry - couldn't resist.

> That's about the only practical advantage I can see. And, I think
> that's something that could be integrated into Test::Unit if we really
> wanted it.

indeedy.  and change T to B while you're at it.  much more efficient  
and speedy.

a @ http://codeforpeople.com/
--
we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being  
better. simply reflect on that.
h.h. the 14th dalai lama