On Nov 18, 2008, at 9:18 AM, Daniel Berger wrote:

> Dunno. Don't care. I don't feel the need for DSL-y notation in my
> tests.
>
> assert_rocks(Test::Unit) # Test::Unit 2 anyway
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>


i'm with you dan - the fact that 'should' somehow produces better code  
that 'assert' is plain crazy.  so is changing a T(DD) to a B.


a @ http://codeforpeople.com/
--
we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being  
better. simply reflect on that.
h.h. the 14th dalai lama