Hi,

At Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:31:53 +0900,
Michael Witrant <mike / lepton.fr> wrote:
> I'm having trouble with emacs' ruby-mode.
> 
> The following "foo" is correctly indented:
>   puts %{ { } }
>   foo
> 
> While this one isn't:  
>   puts %{ #{ } }
>       foo

The patch may fix it.

> I often use the second one to dynamically produce Ruby code and I would
> like it indented like static code. Most of the time it works, but in
> this case ruby-mode probably see #{ as a comment instead of a command
> substitution.

The cause was that %{ after a word wasn't counted a beginning
of string literal.  Therefore #{ was counted a comment outside
of string.

And %w!...! was missing.


Index: ruby-mode.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ruby/src/ruby/misc/ruby-mode.el,v
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -2 -p -r1.43 ruby-mode.el
--- ruby-mode.el	2002/01/18 14:24:01	1.43
+++ ruby-mode.el	2002/01/21 20:49:58
@@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ The variable ruby-indent-level controls 
 		 (goto-char (match-end 0))
 		 (looking-at "\\>"))
+		((eq option 'expr-arg)
+		 (looking-at "[a-zA-Z][a-zA-z0-9_]* +%[Qqrxw]?\\Sw"))
 		(t
-		 (and (not (eq option 'expr-arg))
-		      (looking-at "[a-zA-Z][a-zA-z0-9_]* +/[^ \t]"))))))))))
+		 (looking-at "[a-zA-Z][a-zA-z0-9_]* +/[^ \t]")))))))))
 
 (defun ruby-forward-string (term &optional end no-error expand)
@@ -754,5 +755,5 @@ An end of a defun is found by moving for
 	   (6 (7 . ?/)))
 	  ;; %Q!...!
-	  ("\\(^\\|[[\\s <+(,=]\\)%[xrqQ]?\\([^a-zA-Z0-9 \n]\\)[^\n\\\\]*\\(\\\\.[^\n\\\\]*\\)*\\(\\2\\)"
+	  ("\\(^\\|[[\\s <+(,=]\\)%[xrwqQ]?\\([^a-zA-Z0-9<({[ \n]\\)[^\n\\\\]*\\(\\\\.[^\n\\\\]*\\)*\\(\\2\\)"
 	   (2 (7 . nil))
 	   (4 (7 . nil)))


-- 
Nobu Nakada