On Sep 18, 9:25=A0am, Krzysieq <krzys... / gazeta.pl> wrote:
> [Note: =A0parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]
>
> Unfortunately, there's no way telling the original encoding. I would rath=
er
> go for some method of removing / substituting the chars that don't belong
> there, but the method first suggested by Brian doesn't seem to work for s=
ome
> reason. Does anyone have another option?

Try the iconv solutions with latin-1 (iso-8859-1) as the From. That's
as close as you can get to a one-byte "anything-goes" encoding.

-Mark.