On Sep 17, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Brian Candler wrote:

> Could you define "context" in this, erm, context? :-)
>
> I thought that 'def' started a new scope/context. If a thread is  
> started
> from within def, how could it know about objects which are only
> referenced from outside that scope?

nope - we'll have to wait for matz!  ;-)


>
>
> It's as if the thread is holding on to bits of stack or bindings which
> really belong to another thread.



yeah - it certainly looks *exactly* that way - push stack and all...


a @ http://codeforpeople.com/
--
we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being  
better. simply reflect on that.
h.h. the 14th dalai lama