2008/8/9 Mayuresh Kathe <kathe.mayuresh / gmail.com>:
> I read the following on wikipedia;
> There is currently no specification of the Ruby language, so the
> original implementation is considered to be the de facto reference.
>
> I'm no authority on these matters, but wouldn't it be safer to draft a
> specification formally?

Rubinius and JRuby use a shared RSpec suite which they use to test
compatiability. It's not the Official Spec(tm) but I think it's the
closest to one.

Farrel
-- 
Aimred - Ruby Development and Consulting
http://www.aimred.com