El Domingo, 20 de Julio de 2008, Joel VanderWerf escribió:
> You have more control this way,
> but you have to remember to either set abort_on_exception or to wrap
> your thread in a handler or to join the thread later. These are three
> styles, each of which has its place.

Well, thanks for the explanation but I have a doubt.

I run a thread "t2" inside thread "t1" but I don't want "t1" to wait to "t2" 
to finish, this is: I don't need "t1" joins "t2".

I also don't want the main program ends because "t2" produces an exception 
that nobody handles, but I want to see the error. Is not a way to get this 
behaviour?

The only solution I see is t1 joins t2, is it?

Thanks a lot.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo