-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:20, Massimiliano Mirra wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:13:48AM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
> > I wonder if there's merit in syncing up with the RAA.succ folks so we
> > can standardize all installations? This is starting to look good.
>
> I'd like to.  The basic concepts are quite simple and open (Debian's
> merit, not mine), they should be able to support several solutions.
>
> RAA.succ folks, anybody listening?
>
>
> Massimiliano

Listening, but not sure to comment on this yet. It is on the TODO list but it 
won't get implemented till my customer deems it as a priority :)

I think this is something that should be discussed, i'm just not sure how to 
do it yet. How does setup.rb and install.rb handle installing things? 
Dave: if you install a package that uses the standard setup.rb or install.rb 
from the RAA does it work for you? From the little thought I have given this 
sensitive subject I thought that packages would also need to have a standard 
install script that they run and use, which if you are using the RAA setup.rb 
and/or install.rb files also demands a standard directory structure. IMHO 
this would be a good thing :)

- -- 
Signed,
Holden Glova
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8PnoK+mF116Lw2cQRAvxWAJ0XvMtc+1e7ZwVLzWmN39Xm9X9Q6gCeOicL
MxgFXZG8BaVQE6KNieSuESk=
=lUDk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----