On Jun 30, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > > The fact that Ruby's threading has many breakages and pitfalls does > not mean threading in general is the wrong way to fix things. Java > threading works extremely well, with the only real requirement that > you must either synchronize or avoid access to shared resources. > Power...responsibility...etc. You can't damn threading because the > standard implementation of Ruby doesn't do it well. > > Perhaps you're right that when you only have access to green threads > that processes are the right way to go, since green threads don't > really gain you anything other than simulated asynchrony. But native > threads done right are as good as separate processes, with the bonus > that you can share fast in-memory access to resources if you're > willing to accept the synchronization cost and complexity. yeah i agree 100% in principle. however i was programming java when stopping threads suddenly became depreciated, which i know you know all about, but for others http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/misc/threadPrimitiveDeprecation.html so doing something as simple as stopping a thread can be complicated. i can kill a process and all resources will be returned to the system. the fact that sun took quite a few years to figure this out, and that matz ruby had the bugs you recently found beg the question: if matz cannot do exceptions + threads right, if sun cannot get stopping a thread right for years, what chance do i have of writing code for, say, a web server that's supposed to run 24x7? i think modern languages are caving to the reality that most (aka average) programmers simply cannot program threads safely and are increasingly moving towards the message passing paradigm ousterhout has been raving about for years. now having said that, i very often use ruby threads but often do so in a message passing fashion and even more often use those threads to spawn processes and achieve parallelism so i definitely am glad they are there (Thread.new{ curl } is ultra powerful). still, i can't help but feel they are destined to become relics - at least in the direct fashion we use them now. kind regards. a @ http://codeforpeople.com/ -- we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being better. simply reflect on that. h.h. the 14th dalai lama