Marc Heiler wrote:
>> I don't know why exactly --only Matz knows-- but IMO the choice is
>> somewhat arbitrary because whichever is chosen, class or module, you
>> have to take away some of its typical behaviors to have it be
>> singletonsomething. 
> 
> At times I wanted a language that does away with the distinction between 
> class and module and objects, and rather focuses on objects, and 
> behaviour only, with  an elegant syntax like ruby has (but less complex 
> as a whole)

I wonder if Io fits the bill?


-- 
James Britt

www.happycamperstudios.com   - Wicked Cool Coding
www.jamesbritt.com           - Playing with Better Toys
www.ruby-doc.org             - Ruby Help & Documentation
www.rubystuff.com            - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff