Garance A Drosihn <drosih / rpi.edu> writes:

> At 4:32 PM +0900 1/7/02, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>In message "Re: the [ruby-talk] is gone?"
>>     on 02/01/07, "Jack Dempsey" <dabigdemp / hotmail.com> writes:
>>
>>|No joke, just wondering why the [ruby-talk 23552] type stamps were
>>|taken out of the subject...
>>
>>OK, many repeatedly ask me to remove them, to see the list mails in
>>threads (using Outlook).  I like those tags (they are still on other
>>ruby related lists on ruby-lang.org).  But a recent vote on
>>rubygarden.org moved me to remove them from ruby-talk.
>
> Just to have "my vote" on record, I do prefer it this way.  I prefer
> it without the [ruby-talk] tag in the subject lines.

ruby-talk should be run by a Majordomo II list server -- then each
subscriber could decide whether they want [ruby-talk] in the subject
or not.  ;-)

-- 
matt