> In message "[ruby-talk:30242] Patch for Ruby 1.7"
>     on 02/01/05, "Lyle Johnson" <ljohnson / resgen.com> writes:
> |
> |Looking at the CVS version of Ruby, the declaration for rb_rescue2() in
> |ruby.h isn't quite right when you're compiling under a C++ compiler. It
> |currently reads:
> |
> |    VALUE rb_rescue2
> |__((VALUE(*)(ANYARGS),VALUE,VALUE(*)(ANYARGS),VALUE,...));
> |
> |but should instead read:
> |
> |    VALUE rb_rescue2
__((VALUE(*)(VALUE),VALUE,VALUE(*)(VALUE),VALUE,...));
>
> I don't remember why I did this.  I guess I must had reason...

So... does that mean it will be fixed or not? If you look at the code for
rb_rescue2() in eval.c it's pretty clear that those two function pointers
(i.e. the first and third arguments to rb_rescue2) only take one argument
and aren't intended to accept variable-length argument lists.