I'm seconding this. The simple prefix "[ruby-talk]" is an wonderfully
simple rule set for this (human) agent. I only wish more lists would signal
where they're coming from through the subject line. (Program my mail
client? - You must be joking.)
Tony
David Alan Black
<dblack / candle.supe To: ruby-talk / ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
rlink.net> cc:
Subject: Re: the [ruby-talk] is gone?
07/01/2002 13:39
Please respond to
ruby-talk
Hi --
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Tobias Reif wrote:
> Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
>
>
> > |is it possible to keep the ruby-talk but remove the message number so
> > |they can still use threading?
> >
> > I felt it's too verbose without numbers. If you really want it, I can
> > configure the server in a minute.
>
>
> That would be really great: threading should work, and users know which
> email is from which group.
I would definitely prefer having [ruby-talk] at the beginning, rather
than nothing. Isn't this pretty standard (without numbers)? For
example, Yahoo groups put [groupname] at the beginning of subject lines
in the email copies of posts.
David
--
David Alan Black
home: dblack / candle.superlink.net
work: blackdav / shu.edu
Web: http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav