On Mar 21, 2008, at 7:32 AM, Matthew Moss wrote:

> Reading all your comments, I believe I could re-present the quiz in a
> couple parts that would be less confusing and more approachable. But
> it doesn't make much sense to do that _and_ summarize this week.
>
> I do want to make this database usable for future quizzes, hence the
> first need to have it searchable. I'm okay to summarize Erik's
> submission, but if y'all want to have another crack at a revised
> version of this quiz, that's cool too.
>
> Comments?

I'm interested in seeing the revision.  That's my two cents.

James Edward Gray II