On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:30 AM, MenTaLguY wrote:

> In a language with side-effects, I've become convinced that the only  
> safe
> way to handle asynchronous exceptions is for code to be  
> uninterruptible by
> default, and only explicitly allow interrupts at specific points  
> (not broad
> regions of code).

no doubt you've read it, but for posterity i'll post it here:

   http://209.85.207.104/search?q=cache:2T61vSNQ4_EJ:home.pacbell.net/ouster/threads.pdf+%22why+threads+are+a+bad+idea%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&client=firefox-a

a @ http://codeforpeople.com/
--
share your knowledge.  it's a way to achieve immortality.
h.h. the 14th dalai lama