On Mar 13, 7:15 ¨Âí¬ Êõîëïî¼êõîëï®®®Àçíáéì®ãïí¾ ÷òïôåº
> On Mar 11, 9:38 ¨Âí¬ Äáîéåì Âåòçåò ¼äêâåò®®®Àçíáéì®ãïí¾ ÷òïôåº
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 11, 5:28 pm, Junkone <junko... / gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > I was reviewing the docs for Module Process  ¨Â×Éγ²ßÐÒÏÃÅÓáî> > > found the following docs for Kill. What does signal 4-8 do and how
> > > does it make it nicer kill. why is it 4-8 and what is the degree of
> > > niceness as it goes along.
>
> > Actually, it's 1 and 4-8. Signals 2 and 3 were chosen for SIGINT and
> > SIGBRK, respectively, because that's what their Unix counterparts are
> > (typically). In practice these will rarely be used.
>
> > They're nicer because they use a different technique for killing a
> > process than the 9 signal does. The 9 signal uses TerminateProcess()
> > behind the scenes, which is a brute force way to kill a process that
> > bypasses any exit handlers the process may have setup. Signals 1 and
> > 4-8 use a CreateRemoteThread() + ExitProcess() technique, which *does*
> > allow the process to run any exit handlers first.
>
> > Regards,
>
> > Dan
>
> is signal 4, 5, 6, 7,8 provide same effect or is 8 better than 7 in
> descending order- Hide quoted text -

1 and 4-8 are all the same.

Regards,

Dan