< :the previous in number
^ :the list in numerical order
> :the next in number
P :the previous (in thread)
N :the next (in thread)
|<:the top of this thread
>|:the next thread
^ :the parent (reply-to)
_:the child (an article replying to this)
>:the elder article having the same parent
<:the youger article having the same parent
---:split window and show thread lists
| :split window (vertically) and show thread lists
~ :close the thread frame
.:the index
..:the index of indices
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, Ron Jeffries wrote:
> Isn't it about time for Ruby to be written entirely in Ruby? What's up
> with that?
Well, I had such a project at some point, and it was called M?taRuby;
however I have only one head, 24 hours/day, and other things to do. But
I'll try to make it progress at least slowly. I'm not aware of any person
other than myself willing to put some real effort on it.
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Ron Jeffries wrote:
> MetaRuby is cool. Will that approach become part of
> core Ruby? Seems it would have some nice advantages. What are reasons
> why it perhaps should not, if there are any?
because Matz is not interested.
________________________________________________________________
Mathieu Bouchard http://hostname.2y.net/~matju