"Sean Russell" <ser / germane-software.com> wrote in message
news:3c215f9b_1 / spamkiller.newsgroups.com...
> MikkelFJ wrote:
>
> I'm a Java developer, by profession, and I really like Ant.  Since I'm
also
> the author of REXML, I'll be happy to make any changes to REXML to make
> sure it suppoorts a Ruby-based Ant.

Sorry didn't mean to imply it couldn't handle Ant. I just haven't had the
opportunity to look closer at REXML, so the statement that "it would be
easy" was an assumption depending on REXML being easy to use. To me it looks
that way, and it may be one more reason to use Ruby.

Now it isn't GPL'ed I hope. Perhaps I should invent a new license is
required for all derived work, which explicitly prohibits GPL style licences
to derive from the source covered by that licences. Since the license itself
is a GPL style license, it would have the nice side effect that you couldn't
use the license itself for derived work.

MikkelFJ