James Gray wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Eric Mahurin wrote:
>>> Treetop was definitely the most popular
>> But not nearly the fastest...
> That's true, but I think the need for raw speed in parsers is seldom  
> the top priority.

I was frankly amazed how much of the discussion was about speed.
Besides, there's an awful lot of useful languages that you can't
do with LL(1). Including Ruby and C...

That said, Treetop is very slow, and we need to improve that.
Fortunately, it's not very hard to.