And it's validating like the OP asked for. Double win!! :) --Jeremy On Jan 29, 2008 6:55 PM, Bryan Duxbury <bryan / rapleaf.com> wrote: > Don't use REXML if performance is important to you. libxml-ruby is > 10-100 times faster than REXML. > > -Bryan > > > On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:55 AM, Lloyd Linklater wrote: > > > Ravindra Kumar wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am looking for a validating XML parser for ruby. I found that there > >> are libxml-ruby and ruby interface to expat available. Could someone > >> please tell me > >> which is the better in terms of performance and functionality? I am > >> looking for a parser that is stable and has good performance. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Ravindra > > > > I searched the archives and found this: > > http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/11/09/rexml-processing-xml-in-ruby.html > > > > Maybe you just typed in the wrong thing to search for and missed this. > > -- > > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > > > > -- http://www.jeremymcanally.com/ My books: Ruby in Practice http://www.manning.com/mcanally/ My free Ruby e-book http://www.humblelittlerubybook.com/ My blogs: http://www.mrneighborly.com/ http://www.rubyinpractice.com/