At Sun, 16 Dec 2001 00:51:00 +0900,
Chr. Rippel <chr_news / gmx.net> wrote:
>  am aware of this - however there does not seem
> to be a good reason IMO to treat them as special
> objects when making an illegal call - that said it's
> really not very important ...

I'm not sure but guess it is because class names are not
necessary since they are unique.  I don't know the real reason,
sorry.


Nobu Nakada