It's unfortunate you didn't name contexts strips and examples bits.
You really could've played up this bacon thing. :)

I like the way this looks.  It plays nice with some specs I was working on.

--Jeremy

On Jan 7, 2008 3:50 PM, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen / gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2008-01-07, Rob Sanheim <rsanheim / gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Today I'm proud to release Bacon 0.9.
> >>
> >> = Bacon -- a small RSpec clone.
> >>
> >> Bacon is a small RSpec clone weighing less than 300 LoC but
> >> nevertheless providing all essential features.
> >
> > Is this a replacement for test/spec, or is test/spec bacon's big brother?
>
> It is not a replacement for test/spec, but a reimplementation of the
> ideas behind it in a compact way.
>
> It does not use Test::Unit.
>
> It is not completely compatible to test/spec or RSpec, but suites are
> reasonably easy to port.
>
> > - rob
>
>



-- 
http://www.jeremymcanally.com/

My books:
Ruby in Practice
http://www.manning.com/mcanally/

My free Ruby e-book
http://www.humblelittlerubybook.com/

My blogs:
http://www.mrneighborly.com/
http://www.rubyinpractice.com/