On Jan 7, 2008, at 00:24 , Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:
> 	I think you made the classic mistake of comparing a merb template  
> rendered inside of a layout rather than a standalone template like  
> you are testing with vintage. Here are my numbers for the same  
> template with no layout in merb and vintage, Also note that this  
> goes through merbs router and instantiates a full controlller  
> object which vintage does not.
>
> Merb evented mongrel:
>
> ab -n 1000 -c 1   Requests per second:    911.04 [#/sec] (mean)
> ab -n 1000 -c 10  Requests per second:    1073.71 [#/sec] (mean)
> ab -n 1000 0c 100 Requests per second:    1232.75 [#/sec] (mean)
>
> Vintage evented mongrel:
>
> ab -n 1000 -c 1   Requests per second:    1103.15 [#/sec] (mean)
> ab -n 1000 -c 10  Requests per second:    1232.75 [#/sec] (mean)
> ab -n 1000 0c 100 Requests per second:    1309.67 [#/sec] (mean)
>
>
> 	Clearly a bit faster but not as much as indicated when compared in  
> a fair test.

Thanks, still kicking merb's hubcaps.

Corey