On Jan 6, 7:07 ¨Βν¬ ΔεξιΘεξξεσσω Όδε®®®ΐθεξξεσσωξετ®γονχςοτεΊ
> Gah! There was a bug - it valued aces after other cards but didn't > take into account other aces.

Yeah, it was a pretty subtle issue.  I read your code many times,
certain that it worked the same as mine.  It was only because the
biggest differences in our results was when ace was the upcard that I
focused on the ace-handling code..

Thanks for going after the exact odds!  I don't think I would have
tried it had you not demonstrated that it was possible.

Eric