Robert Klemme wrote:
> I do not see why allowing last= would make lasts(n)= necessary.

For consistency. I believe that any method foo= should be equivalent to the 
method foo except for the fact that it sets the value instead of getting it, 
which in this case isn't possible (without changing the language). I mean, 
that's not a major problem, but it'd feel a tad incosistent to me.


-- 
Jabber: sepp2k / jabber.org
ICQ: 205544826