On Dec 27, 2007 7:11 AM, Dave Thomas <dave / pragprog.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2007, at 4:53 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> > I'm a little concerned that some folks are jumping on 1.9 as an
> > immediate replacement for Ruby 1.8, which it isn't.
> Me too:
> http://pragdave.blogs.pragprog.com/pragdave/2007/12/ruby-19right-fo.html

will it be "safe" to say that the baptism of fire for ruby1.9 is
lettting it run/support rails 2.0.2 without errors?

kind regards -botp